BC
Housing Still Most Unaffordable - March 14, 2008
British
Columbia's affordability conditions deteriorated across every housing
segment at the end of 2007, and the province remained the least affordable
province in Canada to purchase a home, according to the latest housing
report released today by RBC Economics.
"The housing market in B.C. sits at its most stressed point on
record in terms of affordability conditions. Two-storey homes have
carried the brunt of the deterioration as the hot Vancouver market
remains in deeply-stressed territory," said Derek Holt,
assistant chief economist, RBC. "However, we believe B.C.'s housing
market is poised for some affordability relief in 2008 as cooler price
gains and lower interest rates push through."
The RBC Affordability measure for British Columbia, which captures
the proportion of pretax household income needed to service the costs
of owning a home, deteriorated across all housing segments as the
detached bungalow moved to 68.5 per cent, the standard townhouse to
52 per cent, the standard condo to 37 per cent, and the standard two-story
home to 74 per cent.
There are several key fundamentals indicating a gradual re-balancing
of the province's housing market. The sales-to-new listings ratio
is declining and five-year fixed mortgage rates are expected to drift
approximately 75 basis points lower than current levels.
Although house price growth picked up at the end of 2007, the province's
weakening economy is expected to dampen demand for existing homes
and push house price gains to approximately seven per cent this year,
down from 12 per cent in 2007.
In Vancouver, the pace of rising housing prices continues to pressure
affordability conditions across the market. The sharp erosion in the
city's housing conditions will start to filter through the resale
market in 2008, slowing the pace of housing activity. The new home
market continues to be driven by sales in condos and townhouses -
which soared by more than 45 per cent in February. Despite the surge,
housing starts should begin to moderate in 2008. A general weakening
in Vancouver's economy will affect job and income growth, and as a
result, will also weigh heavily on the housing sector going forward.
"Two-storey homes are driving most of the affordability erosion
in Vancouver. The average selling price is close to $650,000, which
is 35 per cent above the average price for a comparable home in Toronto,"
noted Holt. The report also presents a comparison of Canadian and
U.S. household finances, and shows that Americans are still modestly
richer, but much more heavily leveraged and further in debt with less
liquidity. That, in turn, makes them more vulnerable to ongoing credit
market turmoil and risks towards house prices than Canadians. In fact,
the sharp depreciation in the U.S. dollar over the past six years
has made Canadians relatively richer over time, by raising the value
of what their wealth will buy in world markets compared to that of
their American counterparts.
The report also looked at mortgage carrying costs relative to incomes
for a broader sampling of cities across the country, including Victoria.
For these smaller cities, RBC has used a narrower measure of housing
affordability that only takes mortgage payments relative to income
into account.
RBC's Affordability measure for a detached bungalow for Canada's largest
cities is as follows: Vancouver 74 per cent, Toronto 47 per cent,
Calgary 42 per cent, Montreal 37 per cent and Ottawa 32 per cent.
The Housing Affordability measure, which RBC has compiled since 1985,
is based on the costs of owning a detached bungalow, a reasonable
property benchmark for the housing market. Alternative housing types
are also presented including a standard two-storey home, a standard
townhouse and a standard condo. The higher the reading, the more costly
it is to afford a home. For example, an Affordability reading of 50
per cent means that homeownership costs, including mortgage payments,
utilities and property taxes, take up 50 per cent of a typical household's
monthly pre-tax income.
Housing
Prices Still Rising - March 11, 2008
The
cost of new housing accelerated for the second month in a row in January,
the result of a strengthening housing market in the Atlantic and Prairie
provinces.
Nationally, contractors'
selling prices rose 6.5% between January 2007 and January 2008, a
faster pace than the year-over-year increase of 6.2% in December according
to a report released this morning by Statistics Canada. These back-to-back
increases followed 16 months in which the gains in new housing prices
had been decelerating.
On a monthly basis,
prices rose 0.6% between December and January, resulting in a New
Housing Price Index of 157.6 (1997=100).
Here, on the West
Coast, the 12-month increase for Vancouver was 6.5%, while in Victoria,
the year-over-year increase in contractors' selling prices was 1.6%,
unchanged from December.
Looking at the
rest of the country, prices again rose at the fastest pace in Saskatoon,
which led the nation with an annual price increase of 51.7%. On a
month-over-month basis, housing prices rose 4.5% between December
and January. This increase was due to a number of factors, including
increased costs for material and labour, as well as strong market
conditions and increased demand for land.
In Regina, the
year-over-year increase was 25.9%, unchanged from December. Prices
were also unchanged in January from December 2007.
In Calgary, prices
rose 5.6% between January 2007 and January 2008, slightly slower than
the 6.0% year-over-year increase the month before. On a monthly basis,
new housing prices in Calgary were up 0.3%. Some builders reported
increased costs for material and labour, although these were moderated
by other builders who reduced their prices to stimulate sales. Some
developers increased their lot prices to be more in line with current
market conditions.
In Edmonton, the
year-over-year increase was 19.0%, while prices fell 0.5% from December
2007 due to slower market conditions.
In the Atlantic
region, buyers in Halifax saw prices rise 11.4% from January 2007.
This was due to higher costs for materials and labour, increased demand
and higher lot prices. Homebuyers in St. John's saw a 9.1% gain on
a 12-month basis. The principal factors were higher material and labour
costs.
Windsor recorded
year-over-year deflation for the 16th month straight, with prices
falling 0.9% from January 2007. Contractors' selling prices for January
rose 0.2% from the previous month. Elsewhere in Ontario, contractors'
selling prices were 4.2% higher than in January 2007 in Toronto, and
2.0% higher in OttawaGatineau.
In Montréal,
the 12-month growth rate rose to 4.6%, while in Québec, prices
increased 6.3%. Increases in both cities were due to a competitive
market and higher material and labour costs.
Housing
Boom Finishing with a Bang - March 10, 2008
The
seasonally adjusted annual rate of housing starts was 256,900 units
in February, up from 222,700 units in January, according to Canada
Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC).
New home
construction in February was boosted by the significant rise in multiple-family
starts, said Bob Dugan, Chief Economist at CMHCs
Market Analysis Centre. The robust results achieved this month
are mainly attributed to increased condominium starts, which reflect
strong condominium sales over the past year or two. Despite this sizeable
growth in February, we continue to expect that the trend in housing
starts will decrease gradually between now and the end of 2008.
In February the
seasonally adjusted annual rate of urban starts increased 18.0 per
cent to 223,700 units compared to January. Urban multiples jumped
30.3 per cent to 140,700 units in February, while singles rose 1.8
per cent to 83,000 units.
The seasonally
adjusted annual rate of urban starts increased in four of Canadas
five regions in February. Urban starts registered an increase of 45.2
per cent in British Columbia, 26.2 per cent in Quebec, 16.9 per cent
in the Atlantic region and 16.4 per cent in Ontario. The Prairies
bucked the trend and registered a decline of 9.6 per cent in February.
Urban multiple starts were up in all regions except in the Atlantic
and the Prairies. Urban singles were up in all regions except British
Columbia and the Prairies.
Rural starts were
estimated at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 33,200 units in
February.
Actual starts,
in rural and urban areas combined, were up an estimated 8.1 per cent
in the first two months of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007.
In urban areas, actual total starts increased by an estimated 10.4
per cent year-to-date. Actual urban single starts from January to
February 2008 were down 11.0 per cent compared to the same period
in 2007, while multiple starts grew by approximately 25.9 per cent
over the same period.
BC
Building Permits Fall by 22 Per Cent - March 6, 2008
The
value of building permits in January fell below the $6-billion mark
for the first time since April 2007. An increase in the non-residential
sector was insufficient to compensate for fewer construction intentions
in the residential area. According to a report released this morning
by Statistics Canada, municipalities issued $5.9 billion worth of
building permits, down 2.9% from the December 2007 value of $6.0 billion.
This was a third consecutive monthly decline.
Despite the recent
declines, building sites should remain busy in the first part of 2008
since construction intentions were strong in 2007. Building permits
are a leading indicator for construction activity.
In the residential
sector, the value of building permits dropped by 13.9% to $3.3 billion.
This was fuelled by a 26.9% drop in multi-family housing. Intentions
also decreased in the single-family component (-5.4%).
After two consecutive
monthly decreases, the value of non-residential permits increased
by 16.4% to $2.5 billion. January's gain was due to increases in institutional,
commercial and industrial permits.
Important movement
in permits in Ontario
Provincially, the largest gain (in dollars) occurred in Ontario, where
municipalities approved $2.4 billion worth of permits in January.
A record high was reached in the value of non-residential permits
(+68.8% to $1.4 billion). The Ontario non-residential components (industrial,
commercial and institutional) all had very high values in January.
These increases more than offset a 29.1% drop in residential permits,
the largest among all provinces.
Alberta also posted
a significant gain (+4.2% to $1.2 billion) in the total value of permits,
thanks to growth coming from the industrial and the institutional
components.
Quebec experienced,
to a lesser extent, a state of affairs similar to Ontario. A decline
in residential permits (-2.7%) was offset by an increase in non-residential
sector (+14.0%) leading the total value of permits to $989 million
in January, up 1.9% from December.
The total value
of building permits fell in four provinces. With significant drops
in both residential and non-residential components, the largest decrease
in dollars occurred in British Columbia, where the total value of
permits dropped 22.4% to $815 million, the lowest level since April
2006.
Important retreats
also occurred in Saskatchewan (-44.4%) and Newfoundland and Labrador
(-54.6%). In both provinces, the drops followed exceptional results
in the non-residential sector in December.
Housing sector:
The demand for multi-family units drops
The value of permits for multi-family dwellings fell by 26.9% in January
to $1.1 billion, the lowest amount since February 2007. The number
of multiple-family units approved decreased by 17.6% to 8,216.
Single-family
permits decreased by 5.4% to $2.2 billion. The corresponding number
of units declined by 5.5%.
Both single- and
multi-family units approved have been on a downward trend since the
summer of 2007.
Strength in employment,
growth in disposable income, dynamic economy in Western Canada and
tight apartment vacancy rates in certain centres are factors that
could affect positively the demand for housing. On the other hand,
the impact of price increases on housing affordability and the signs
of a weakening US economy and their spillover effects in Canada could
erode the demand.
All non-residential
components are on the rise
The value of permits in the institutional component jumped 26.6% in
January to $701 million. This gain followed two consecutive monthly
declines. Large projects for medical buildings in Ontario and Alberta
were behind this marked increase.
The value of commercial
permits gained 9.0% in January to $1.4 billion, thanks to several
large projects for office buildings in Ontario. In 2007, this category
played a key role in the strong showing of the commercial component.
Having reached
a 10-month low in December, the value of industrial permits rebounded
with a 28.1% gain in January as the value of permits totalled $423
million. Construction projects for manufacturing buildings in Ontario
and for utility buildings in Alberta led to this gain.
Despite the strong
results in January, the value of permits in the commercial and industrial
components has been on a downward trend since the summer of 2007.
In contrast, the institutional component has been maintaining its
upward trend since February 2007.
The non-residential
sector continued to be positively affected by low office vacancy rates,
the vigorous retail sector and strong corporate profits. Furthermore,
business and government intend to increase their spending in non-residential
construction in 2008, according to the latest Private and Public Investment
Survey released on February 27, 2008.
Metropolitan
areas: Sharp decline in Vancouver
The total value of permits declined in 15 out of the 34 metropolitan
areas in January. The largest decline occurred in Vancouver as $427
million worth of permits were issued, the second lowest level since
April 2006 (the lowest being in September 2007 when there was a municipal
strike in the city of Vancouver). Marked declines occurred in both
residential and non-residential sectors. Barrie and Saskatoon also
showed substantial declines in January, after record levels in December
2007.
In contrast, significant
increases occurred in Edmonton, London and Montréal due largely
to projects in the non-residential sector.
In Toronto, a
tremendous gain in the non-residential sector (+143.2%) was largely
offset by a sharp decline in residential construction intentions.
More
Energy Efficient Homes are the Future - March 5, 2008
Increasing
concern over climate change has people thinking about ways to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions according to a recent release from the Institute
for Research in Construction. One recent event where the subject was
front and centre was a forum called "Getting to zero: Defining
the path to Net Zero Energy Home Construction." First held in
Ottawa and second in Toronto in Spring 2007, the forum examined this
emerging trend in home construction and where it might fit in residential
housing. Attendees included Canadian and U.S. builders, developers,
government officials, utilities representatives and building product
manufacturers.
A Net Zero Energy
Home (NZEH) is a home that uses existing renewable energy sources
(including passive and active solar, solar photovoltaic and geothermal
technology) and proven energy conservation techniques to supply at
least as much power to the electrical grid as it consumes. In other
words, the net amount of electrical energy purchased for the home
over a year is zero.
Panel discussions
at the forum examined Canadian perspectives on NZEH, technical considerations
in NZEH deployment and design, and how the NZEH concept is gaining
momentum in Ontario. New and emerging approaches to NZEH, such as
"net zero cost", "net zero electricity" and "zero
utility peak demand" were also a hot topic. Zero utility peak
demand, in particular, attracted attention because it is achievable
in cold climates, such as those found in Ontario. It stipulates that
the house produces energy equal to the amount supplied by a utility
during peak times.
Although the NZEH
approach is common in many countries such as Japan and Germany, it
is just beginning to catch on in Canada and the U.S. According to
Forum participants, there are still significant barriers to be overcome,
including difficulties in financing NZEH construction, a lack of incentives
to convert conventional homes to NZEHs, a lack of unified building
labels and guidelines, and difficulties in moving NZEHs on the re-sale
market.
To learn more
about NZEH and about the forums, see the Net Zero Energy Home Coalition
Web site.
Is
the Building Boom Winding Down - March 4, 2008
According
to RBC Royal Bank's 15th Annual Homeownership Survey, the pace of
homebuying in British Columbia is set to slow as fewer B.C. residents
intend to buy a home in the next two years. The poll found that 26
per cent of B.C. residents are either "very likely" or "somewhat
likely" to buy a home, down eight per cent from 2007.
The number of British Columbians who would "buy now" in
light of elevated house prices and unstable economic conditions, has
also slipped to 47 per cent, from 59 per cent in 2007. Nevertheless,
a strong majority of BC residents (85 per cent) still believe that
buying a house or condominium is a "good" or "very
good" investment.
"In 2008, we may see a shift in homebuying activity as purchase
intentions appear to be softening and an increased number of potential
buyers say it makes more sense to delay the purchase a home until
next year," said Kevin Lutz, regional manager, Mortgage
Specialists, RBC Royal Bank. "This change in sentiment can likely
be attributed to a number of factors such as the rise in home prices
and concerns about the economy, yet British Columbians continue to
see great value in homeownership."
Among those looking to purchase a home in the next two years, 85 per
cent said they will likely buy a resale home and 62 per cent said
they would want a detached house. While 41 per cent said they plan
on buying a home larger than their current residence, the number of
those looking for a smaller home (29 per cent) is greater in B.C.
than in any other region across the country.
On average, B.C. homeowners approximate the value of their home at
$341,401, well above the national average of $239,560. They also estimate
that the value of their home has increased by an average of 28 per
cent over the last two years, making it among the highest percentage
increases in the country.
According to the poll, 17 per cent of British Columbians who plan
to buy a home in the next two years say they will choose a variable
rate mortgage, up from 14 per cent last year. However, fixed rate
mortgages remain the preferred choice with 44 per cent of respondents
planning to lock in their rate. Thirty-nine per cent said they plan
to choose a combination of both fixed and variable.
Residential
Construction Investment Up in 2007
- March 3, 2008
The
total value of residential construction investment for 2007 reached
$88.7 billion, an increase of 8.5% compared with 2006. All components
of residential construction (new housing, renovation and acquisition
costs) and all provinces and territories saw gains. According to a
resport released this morning by Statistics Canada, in constant dollars,
the increase in the overall residential construction investments in
2007 was 2.3%.
Among provinces,
the biggest increases (in dollars) occurred in Alberta (+18.9% to
$14.8 billion) and in Quebec (+8.0% to $19.1 billion). In percentage
terms, Saskatchewan led the rest with an increase of 37.5%.
New housing investment
represented the largest contribution in dollars, posting an increase
of 8.5% to $44.2 billion. This increase stemmed mainly from investments
in single-family homes, which rose 7.2% to $27.4 billion, and in apartment
and condominium construction, which increased 9.7% to $10.3 billion.
The favourable
job situation, growth in disposable income, attractive financing options
and strength of the economy in Western Canada continued to support
the demand for housing. The rise in the price of houses also played
an important role in the increase in investments. The New Housing
Price Index (house-only component) increased by 7.4% in 2007 compared
with the previous year.
In 2007, construction
spending in constant dollars fell 2.2% for new single-family housing
and remained unchanged for apartments and condominiums.
In 2007, renovations
increased 9.5% to $36.8 billion, which represented 41.5% of all residential
construction investments. Acquisition costs represented 8.6% of total
investments, or $7.7 billion, up 4.1% compared with 2006.
For the fourth
quarter of 2007, construction investment increased 10.6% compared
with the same quarter in 2006 to $23.1 billion. The increase came
from new housing, renovations and acquisition costs.
Spending on new
housing construction reached $11.9 billion, up 12.4% compared with
the same quarter in 2006. This increase stemmed mainly from investments
in new single-family housing construction, which came to $7.3 billion,
an increase of 10.5% compared with the fourth quarter of 2006. Apartment
construction rose 14.0% to $2.9 billion.
The increase in
new housing investment was largely attributable to the increase in
the average cost of new units. In constant dollars, spending on new
single-family housing and apartment or condominium construction were
up 4.2% and 4.4% respectively compared to the fourth quarter of 2006.
Renovation spending
grew 8.3% compared with the fourth quarter of 2006 to $9.2 billion.
Acquisition costs rose 10.3% to $2.0 billion.
Gains were achieved
in all provinces and territories with the exception of Quebec and
the Yukon. The biggest increase (in dollars) was in Alberta (+19.9%
to $4.1 billion), largely due to the increased spending on new housing
construction.
British Columbia
came next with a 19.8% increase in investment to $3.9 billion. Ontario
also had a strong 6.4% increase to $8.4 billion. Renovations in Quebec
fell 4.7%, which contributed to a slight decrease in total investment
for the province.